Friday, November 14, 2008

A theology of FOOD

Sharon and I have gone GREEN. No not tree-hugging, granola-crunching environmentally green. Salad green actually. We have decided that at our age it is time to start making healthier choices when it comes to food. Our diet is consisting of more fruits and vegetables and watching our fat intake while choosing to make recipes that are good for you. Several observations arise out of this experience and have an impact on life as we know it:

One recipe that my dear wife decided to experiment with was three bean stew. It consists of lima beans, black beans and dried kidney beans with a chicken stock base. There are also peppers and spices mixed in for flavor. Sounds good right? And healthy too, right? Nope. Doesn't taste like anything, except spicey. But it is good for you. What continued the locomotion (and I do mean loco) of bringing spoon to face was the knowledge that finally we are eating right. We have become so used to self-indulgent pleasure seeking that we assume that our food should not only be healthy but that it should taste good too. There should be a party in my mouth every time I sit down to a meal, or so we have been trained to think. On the contrary, God has provided us with foods that are made for the body and while that evil thing called a tongue is tempting us to please it, in reality it is the stomach, nay the body, that needs to be served properly. The tongue is but a small part of the body and yet it demands great attention and pleasure. So I learned that to eat is not an experience so much as it is a necessity and one that beckons us to put the right things in the body.

Part of this revelation came through my reading of one of Alexander Solzhenitsyn's novels, A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich. Ivan, or Shukov as he is called in the story, was a political prisoner in a Soviet work camp buried in the Siberian wilderness. The story follows exactly one day in the experiences of Shukov. What is most compelling about Shukov's day is the centrality of food as the ultimate of moments. Shukov is overjoyed when a barrack mate receives his monthly package from family. In that package there is contained sausages and sweets and other goodies. What that means for Shukov is that his bunk mate does not need his ration at supper and therefore he gets two. It turns out that the coveted meal is a hard, crusty bread with a bowl of some sort of gruel. The gruel contains small fish parts that, if one is lucky, may be consumed by sucking the bones clean, chewing on the marrow, and eventually devouring the entire thing. Shukov has a method of eating: because the allotment is meager, he takes out his home made spoon, created from melted down wire scraps, and slowly eats the gruel letting each spoonful wander around his mouth. With the second bowl he does the same slow methodical process within the short time the camp guards allow them to eat. By eating slowly Shukov believed that he received a greater benefit out of the meal and was less hungry than others who simply wolfed down their bowlfuls. And the food was nothing to write home about. That is appreciating food.

It further reminded me of my childhood when I visited my aunts in the town of Steinbach. Forced to tag along with my parents we would visit Tante Trutje (Aunt Gertrude) and Tante Anne. Being of Mennonite heritage their food was also of that sort. Meal time was a terror for a finicky kid who had few favorites in terms of dishes. The old aunties would serve hallopsche (cabbage roles), or borscht, or some overboiled beef with cabbage, or maybe just pluma moos (fruit soup). Being a finicky youngster I remember that even at home when my mom would serve lasagna, I would opt for Lipton's Chicken Noodle soup, much to the chagrin of my brother and sister and other family members. They bugged me constantly about my lack of menu. Back to the aunties then, I think now of how these ladies who had come through the Depression and really hard times must have wondered at the ingrate who sat at their table. When they knew times of hardship having food was a Godsend no matter what it was. Food was food no matter what it tasted like.

Ironically, as time passed, I became a connoisseur of different foods. Now I enjoy the Mennonite, or so called, dishes like borscht and perogies with farmer sausage and cream sauce. But they are not good for the body; they are fatty. I have eaten in Paraguay, Brazil, Turkey and Greece and have an appreciation for the foods of those countries, however different they might be. And now I must deny myself some of them, along with American cuisine, because they are unhealthy. Actually Turkey and Greece both have quite healthy foods (but I'm not living there am I). I have come full circle in my food journey.

The point is this: God has given us food and many other good things in life. Yes they are to be enjoyed but not to the point of worship. If food does not taste fantastic but it is still food and good for the body, give thanks to God and shut up and eat it. Give thanks for all the good things because as the letter written by James in the Bible says, all good things come from God. And eating salad for 30 days makes a trip to Tony Roma's that much sweeter. AMEN

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Remembrance Day



The further along we journey in history the greater our legends grow. Many people in Canada are trying to keep alive the military history of our country. I have no problem with this but wonder how we can do that in a "relevant" conscious way. Our young people would be reminded of the sacrifice that our soldiers made in the Great War, the Second World War and Korea. But for many young Canadians it must be a bit of a stretch. The Germans who were once considered baby-eaters and Huns, the scourge of modern Europe, now make some great cars and other products, are NATO allies, and would be the last nation on the Axis of Evil, if such a thing existed. The same could be said for the Japanese, who also make great cars and other products and are allies in the Pacific. In fact, to the post-Modern mind it is a strain to try and imagine that these people were ever our enemies.

However, we find continual emphasis placed on remembering, at least on November 11th, that our freedom came with a cost. For those of a Non-Peace Church tradition a Scripture is attached to the memory and emotion of these young men and women: "Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends" John 15:13. Jesus was applying these words to the upcoming event of his crucifixion and the propitiation he would exact from this act. Seriously, this is not the same thing at all. But it is hard to argue that those who died in the Wars did not sacrifice themselves for upcoming generations who would reap the benefits of not having to live under the tyranny of German rule.

World War 1 makes the least sense of most wars. The "Cousins" were bored with their royal rule and decided a war would shake things up. Okay, that's not exactly what happened. How Germany found a case for war in the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand is beyond my understanding. What that had to do with France or Great Britain is also beyond rational comprehension. Canadian pride and loyalty to the Crown drove our nation into this war with the result that an identity was born for this young nation. But at what cost? Yet this is the war that reminds us most of the sober pride we have in our contribution as Canadians. Hey, the Canadians were the storm troopers of the First World War - there were none better. They would have gone all the way to Berlin if the War had not ended. It's just that to today's teenager it is a difficult thing to explain the reason for this War.

World War 2 came the closest to being labeled a "Just War." Hitler was the great Antichrist of the middle 20th century and Nazi power had to be broken. The Axis agenda was truly to conquer and rule the world, or so the propaganda has led me to believe. However, this War could have been avoided had the League of Nations shown a little more grace to the humbled German empire of the post-World War 1 era. This tragedy might have been averted had the triumphant nations not "stuck it to them" and exacted a revenge that decimated the economy of Germany. Out of this quagmire and misery came the opportunity to birth a Fuhrer of tremendously evil proportions.

Well, I started out wanting to write a tribute to the young Canadians of World War 1. What happened? Guess my thoughts went astray of my ambition. I wanted to write about the young man from the small Manitoba town that joined up with the Royal Winnipeg Rifles to see the world, have some fun and be home by Christmas. I wanted to express his thoughts of horror as he realized in the midst of intense shelling, the disintegration of friends in those blasts, the smell of rotting flesh and missing limbs, that he was in hell. That it dawned on him that winning medals and achieving glory were nothing compared to surviving and getting out somehow. Or that maybe he knew that now that he was "in it" that he had to finish the job whether it made sense or not.

No we cannot forget. Let's not be blind either. Let's not allow the emotionalism of the terrible cost blur the reasons behind this global crucible. Doesn't the slogan "Lest we Forget" urge us to remember the horrors and be very careful this does not happen again? If they laid down their lives so that we could live in this secure, democratic and prosperous nation and did it on the basis of greater love, can we not honor that?